I was browsing through the Thornley Fallis site today – who directed me to the Top 10 most Irritating Phrases in PR.
I’m ok with the first 10 – but this second group that has me a little worried…
Moving forward
Cutting-edge
Leverage (it’s not a verb, people!)
Viral video/marketing
Utilize
Cost-effective
Innovative
Value-added
Forward-thinking
[insert word here] 2.0
I have to admit, I use many of these. (particularly fond of leverage – you want to take away leverage? dang – one woman says it’s her most-hated and showed up a couple more times in the comments)
I kinda thought they were the buzz words of the day – if you don’t include them, do you not put yourself at a disadvantage? Will it make you look like your aren’t on the cusp of all the latest trends and therefore not hip enough for the job?
Now I have been out of the work environment for a few years – and out in a small firm in the country for many more – perhaps once I get back into the swing of working I’ll be able to figure out how to get lose the corporate jargon from my proposals.
I’ll have to give this some more thought, I suppose.
What do you think?
Don’t forget ‘at the end of the day.’ It just takes up room.
Let’s use clear language in house – and in front of clients, too. Turn on your crap detectors and set them to ’self.’
The gap really shows when companies try to take that kind of jargon with them into social media. Uber creepy!
By: mkeeffer on December 1, 2008
at 4:06 pm
Hi Heather,
You have a point with some of those phrases. In some cases they’re ok when used correctly – I meant this in the context of public relations activities. I see far too many of these words showing up in a big long stream in press releases – the latest “cost-effective, cutting-edge viral marketing solution,” which says absolutely nothing about the product.
With that said, I do have a habit of yelling “bingo!” at my colleagues if they start spewing bureaucratic jargon in a meeting…
Cheers,
Dave
By: davefleet on December 9, 2008
at 1:33 pm